Determination of Flow Structure in a Tube Array by Particle Image Velocimetry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) presents a possible approach to measuring two-phase flow parameters over a large area, leading to a snap shot of flow behavior in complex geometries such as tube bundles. Tests have been conducted in a 2m long wavy wall channel simulating the open lane within a rotated triangular array. The results show that liquid phase PIV measurements must be limited to very low void fractions. On the other hand, much information can be gained from the gas phase data. The details of the flow structure within the array are revealed. Current measurements, performed in the bubbly flow regime, show that even in this regime, the flow structure is significantly non-uniform and complex. Bubble diameters have been found to be strongly dependent on flow velocity; the effect of turbulence shear at high flow rates breaking up the bubbles to smaller sizes. The PIV measurements yield the complete averaged velocity vector field in the measurement region. The velocity profiles across the measurement section are also obtained. The non-uniform profiles show the challenges associated with attempts to estimate average void fractions and slip ratios in the array.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".