MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076265782 · doi:10.1109/leos.2007.4382535

Interconnection Technology for Conventional and Concentrator Modules (Solar Cells)

2007· article· en· W2076265782 on OpenAlex
Lawrence F. Rubin, Andreas Schneider

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon and Solar Cell Technologies
Canadian institutionsInnovative Targeting Solutions (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassivationInterconnectionSolar cellMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsConcentratorPhotovoltaic systemReduction (mathematics)ShadingEngineering physicsElectrical engineeringComputer scienceNanotechnologyEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is well known that conventional cell metallization technology has several negative impacts on cell performance. First of all standard design of solar cell front side metallization suffers not only from high shading which is in the range of 6-9% but also from reduction of surface passivation and corresponding higher recombination current in the p/n-junction. Printing of Ag/Al pads at the cell rear side reduces the rear side surface passivation and results in corresponding decrease of Voc value. Furthermore separate technological steps required for Ag/Al pads printing and drying increases the cell costs. Nevertheless PV module tabbing and stringing technology is based on usage of Ag/Al pads for cell interconnection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score0.517

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it