A coelectroporation method for the isolation of cryptic plasmids from Lactococcus lactis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: A coelectroporation method using a marker plasmid for indirect selection of lactococcal plasmids with unassigned functions was evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cryptic plasmids were mixed with an erythromycin resistance (Eryr) marker plasmid and introduced into a recipient strain by electroporation, followed by plasmid extraction of erythromycin-resistant transformants. By optimizing the ratio between the marker plasmid and the cryptic plasmids, an average of 20% cotransformants was obtained, including combinations of more than one cryptic plasmid. The marker plasmid pSA3 was easily eliminated from the cotransformed cells by subculture without selective pressure. CONCLUSION: This cotransformation approach reduces the number of colonies that must be screened to find transformants harbouring cryptic plasmids. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The method facilitates the isolation of cryptic plasmids, helps in assigning functions to unknown plasmids and allows construction of food-grade lactococcal strains with new combinations of wild-type plasmids.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".