MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076299250 · doi:10.1039/c4cp01443j

Pursuit of quantum monodromy in the far-infrared and mid-infrared spectra of NCNCS using synchrotron radiation

2014· article· en· W2076299250 on OpenAlexaffabout
Manfred Winnewisser, Brenda P. Winnewisser, Frank C. De Lucia, D. W. Tokaryk, Stephen C. Ross, Brant Billinghurst

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)University of SaskatchewanUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRotational–vibrational spectroscopyInfraredMonodromySynchrotron radiationQuantumSpectral lineInfrared spectroscopyFar infraredPhysicsOpticsAstronomyQuantum mechanicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quantum monodromy has a dramatic and defining impact on all those physical properties of chain-molecules that depend on a large-amplitude bending coordinate, including in particular the distribution of the ro-vibrational energy levels. As revealed by its pure rotational (a-type) spectrum [B. P. Winnewisser et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2010, 12, 8158-8189] cyanogen iso-thiocyanate, NCNCS, is a particularly illuminating exemplar of quantum monodromy: it clearly shows the distinctive monodromy-induced dislocation of the ro-vibrational energy level pattern for its low-lying bending mode. This dislocation centers on a lattice defect in the energy vs. momentum map of the ro-vibrational levels at the top of the barrier to linearity, and represents an example of an excited state quantum phase transition [D. Larese and F. Iachello, J. Mol. Struct., 2011, 1006, 611-628]. To complete the data, so far limited to ΔJ = +1 transitions, we decided to measure the high-resolution far-infrared band of the large-amplitude bending vibration ν7, and, if possible, mid-infrared bands. This Perspectives article presents our ongoing progress towards this goal, beginning with the description of how to predict line positions and intensities of the a- and b-type bands of the large amplitude bending mode using the Generalized-SemiRigid-Bender (GSRB) Hamiltonian for NCNCS and ab initio dipole moment functions [B. P. Winnewisser et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2010, 12, 8158-8189]. We include background information about synchrotron physics to clarify the advantages and limitations of that radiation source for our experiments. Details of the chemical preparation and sample handling, leading to the realization that NCNCS is 50 kJ mol(-1) lower in energy than its isomer S(CN)2 [Z. Kisiel et al., J. Phys. Chem. A, 2013, 117, 13815-13824] are included. We present the far-infrared and mid-infrared spectrum of NCNCS obtained at the Canadian Light Source synchrotron, using the IFS 125HR Bruker Fourier transform spectrometer. Eight of the fundamental vibrational modes of NCNCS have now been observed at high resolution. Initial analyses of the data confirm band assignments and demonstrate the accuracy of the predictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Chemistry Chemical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207