MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076309490 · doi:10.1109/ias.2006.256805

Diagnosis and Protection of IPM Motors Using Wavelet Packet Transform

2006· article· en· W2076309490 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueConference record · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatorHarmonicsFault (geology)WaveletWavelet transformWavelet packet decompositionFault detection and isolationComputer scienceLine (geometry)EngineeringVoltageArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the practical implementation of a new algorithm for the detection and diagnosis of stator electrical faults in three-phase interior permanent magnet (IPM) motors. Motor current signature analysis is performed off-line on the collected data to extract the most significant features from the fault currents. It has been found that magnitudes of harmonics for motor fault currents can be used to discriminate between different faulted and normal unfaulted conditions. The proposed algorithm utilized the multiresolution property of the WPT, and is based on the identification of fault harmonics using the selected mother wavelet `db3'. The novel wavelet packet transform (WPT) based algorithm for the protection of IPM motors is implemented and tested on-line on the laboratory 1-hp and 5-hp IPM motors. The single phasing fault, single line to ground (L-G) fault and line-to-line (L-L) fault are investigated. In all the tests carried out, the faults are detected, and the trip signal is initiated almost at the instant or within one cycle of the fault occurrence

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.583

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it