MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076330300 · doi:10.2495/mpf070321

Numerical modelling of colloidal fluid in a viscous micropump

2007· article· en· W2076330300 on OpenAlex
Haifa El‐Sadi, Nabil Esmail

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWIT transactions on engineering sciences · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicropumpMechanicsBingham plasticCylinderMicrochannelNon-Newtonian fluidNewtonian fluidFluid dynamicsHerschel–Bulkley fluidGeneralized Newtonian fluidMaterials scienceViscous liquidFlow (mathematics)NanofluidComplex fluidRheologyMechanical engineeringPhysicsShear rateEngineeringComposite materialHeat transferNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non-Newtonian fluid can be encountered in many applications of Microdevices. In this study, two-dimensional non-Newtonian simulations of a viscous micropump were performed. The viscous micropump consists of a rotating cylinder located eccentrically inside a microchannel. When the cylinder rotates, a net force is transferred to the fluid due to the unequal shear stresses on the upper and lower surfaces of the cylinder, thus causing the fluid to displace. Non-Newtonian fluid is predicted by Navier Stokes equations and proposed by a modified Bingham model to describe the fluid flow

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.741
Threshold uncertainty score0.524

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it