MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076356974 · doi:10.5339/qfarf.2013.biop-0128

An Patient Education Framework For Designing Personalized Self-Management Interventions For Home-Based Chronic Disease Management

2013· article· en· W2076356974 on OpenAlexaff
Syed Sibte Raza Abidi

Bibliographic record

VenueQatar Foundation Annual Research Forum Volume 2013 Issue 1 · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Management and Education
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSelf-managementPsychological interventionGoal settingDisease managementHealth careProcess managementPatient educationKnowledge managementPsychologySocial cognitive theoryProcess (computing)MedicineHealth management systemComputer scienceNursingPsychotherapistBusinessSocial psychologyArtificial intelligenceAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patient engagement in their care process, vis-à-vis self-management programs is an important element of the patient's longitudinal care plan, where the patient is encouraged and expected to achieve self-efficacy in the self-management of the disease through a regime of educational and behavioral modification strategies. To ensure the effectiveness of self-management programs, it is important that the proposed self-management interventions are (a) personalized to the unique needs and constraints of the patient; (b) based on sound theoretical health models; (c) based on validated health and behavior assessment tools to determine the patient's physical and behavioral dispositions; and (d) readily accessible to the patient through a ubiquitous medium, such as smart phones or the web. In this paper, we present a novel personalized self-management framework that delivers personalized health educational interventions to empower, educate and engage patients/individuals through self-observation, barrier identification, goal setting and action planning to achieve behavioral self-efficacy and self-regulation so that individuals can self-manage their condition. Our personalized self-management framework is guided by Social Cognition Theory, whereby have ensured that self-management programs for chronic disease management not just focus on changing the patient's awareness of the disease, rather they focus on enhancing the ability of the patient to make the right choices to achieve effective disease management. We present a three-stage personalized self-management framework that comprises: Stage 1: A high-level characterization of an individual with respect to a specific health outcome using validated assessment tools; Stage 2: A behavioral categorization of the individual based on his/her levels of self-efficacy, motivation and self-regulation, etc.; Stage 3: Use the personalized profile of the individual to tailor generic educational and self-management to develop a personalized self-management program that comprises personalized strategies to counter the challenges and barriers faced by the individual to achieving positive self-efficacy and self-regulation which in turn will lead to positive health outcomes. Our personalized self-management framework features (a) a novel self-management oriented individual profiling mechanism that takes into account both the health and psychosocial characteristics of an individual to generate his/her holistic profile; (b) a semantic web based knowledge model that captures the theoretical foundations of the SCT in terms of a Self-Management Program Personalization (SPP) ontology; (c) a semantic web based personalization tool that uses a logic-based execution engine that reasons over the SPP ontology, based on an individual's profile, to generate personalized self-management interventions; and (d) a mobile messaging platform to deliver the personalized self-management interventions and to monitor the patient's compliance using smart phones. We take a semantic web approach in designing the personalization approach whereby we have developed the SPP ontology to (a) model the theoretical framework of SCT in terms of SCT concepts; (b) model health assessment tools; (c) model the personalization rules that integrate the health and SCT models with the educational messages to generate a personalized self-management program. We have demonstrated the novel integration of health models, educational content and behavior change strategies to design self-management programs for cardiac risk factors, where the program is delivered through a mobile app.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.543
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQatar Foundation Annual Research Forum Volume 2013 Issue 1Same topicDiabetes Management and EducationFrench-language works237,207