MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076390352 · doi:10.1515/epoly.2004.4.1.53

N-Alkylacrylamide copolymers with (meth)acrylamide derivatives of cholic acid: Solution properties and aggregation

2004· article· en· W2076390352 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuee-Polymers · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSurfactants and Colloidal Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCholic acidMethacrylamideCopolymerChemistryAcrylamideMicellar solutionsCritical micelle concentrationPolymer chemistryMicellePolymerOrganic chemistryAqueous solutionBile acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Solution properties of a series of thermosensitive copolymers based on acrylamide and methacrylamide derivatives of cholic acid and N- alkylacrylamides such as N , N -diethylacrylamide, N -ethylacrylamide, and N -isopropylacrylamide have been studied by various techniques including fluorescence and turbidimetry. These copolymers contained 1 - 5 mol-% of the (meth)acrylamide derivatives of cholic acid as determined by NMR spectroscopy. A two-stage aggregation process was observed for the copolymers of N -isopropylacrylamide when the number of cholic acid residues was sufficiently high. The presence of the copolymers lowered the critical micellar concentration of sodium dodecyl sulfate but had little effect on the micellization of sodium cholate. The critical micellar concentration of these copolymers decreased with increasing content of cholic acid residues in the polymers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.819

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it