MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076390352 · doi:10.1515/epoly.2004.4.1.53

N-Alkylacrylamide copolymers with (meth)acrylamide derivatives of cholic acid: Solution properties and aggregation

2004· article· en· W2076390352 on OpenAlexafffund
Damien Avoce, Wilms E. Baille, X. X. Zhu

Bibliographic record

Venuee-Polymers · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSurfactants and Colloidal Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCholic acidMethacrylamideCopolymerChemistryAcrylamideMicellar solutionsCritical micelle concentrationPolymer chemistryMicellePolymerOrganic chemistryAqueous solutionBile acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Solution properties of a series of thermosensitive copolymers based on acrylamide and methacrylamide derivatives of cholic acid and N-alkylacrylamides such as N,N-diethylacrylamide, N-ethylacrylamide, and N-isopropylacrylamide have been studied by various techniques including fluorescence and turbidimetry. These copolymers contained 1 - 5 mol-% of the (meth)acrylamide derivatives of cholic acid as determined by NMR spectroscopy. A two-stage aggregation process was observed for the copolymers of N-isopropylacrylamide when the number of cholic acid residues was sufficiently high. The presence of the copolymers lowered the critical micellar concentration of sodium dodecyl sulfate but had little effect on the micellization of sodium cholate. The critical micellar concentration of these copolymers decreased with increasing content of cholic acid residues in the polymers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuee-PolymersSame topicSurfactants and Colloidal SystemsFrench-language works237,207