Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective 1) Determine the effect of surgical therapy for Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) on patient quality of life in a tertiary care centre in Quebec. 2) Compare the outcome of endoscopic sinus surgery on patients with different comorbidities. Methods Prospective cohort study. Subjects were consecutive patients with a diagnosis of CRS who failed medical treatment and were undergoing Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (ESS). General health (SF‐12 v2) and disease‐specific (chronic sinusitis survey (CSS)) outcomes questionnaires were filled out pre‐operatively and postoperatively. Results 152 patients were enrolled in a 7‐month period. 120 patients completed the postoperative surveys. The most common co‐morbidity was asthma (40%). 72% had clinical improvement, 12% worsened, and 15% were unchanged. The average improvement of CSS scores was 17%. Conclusions Significant improvement in quality of life was achieved after ESS for patients with CRS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".