Effect of symmetry breaking and substrate on the optical properties of silver sphere-like nanoparticles in different surrounding media
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of the substrate to the absorption spectra of silver nanoparticles of sphere-like shapes is investigated. Silver nanoparticles of broken spherical symmetry are placed on substrates of different dielectric functions at various contact angles (α). The absorption efficiency of the supported nanoparticles is calculated by using the Discrete Dipole Approximation (DDA) method. Increasing the value of α and, hence the contact area of the supported nanoparticles, results in an inhomogeneous distribution of the polarization charges over the nanoparticle-substrate system. This leads to the excitation of plasmonic bands of different characters (dipolar and quadrupole modes). The admixture of both dipolar and quadrupole modes is found to be more pronounced when a nanoparticle with highest contact area (α = 90o, hemispherical shape) is considered. The band position of the Longitudinal Mode (LM) is red-shifted with α, while the resonance wavelength of the Transverse Mode (TM) is blue-shifted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".