MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076432505 · doi:10.1002/ceat.200301652

Performance of a New Mixed Down Pumping Impeller

2003· article· en· W2076432505 on OpenAlex
Gabriel Ascanio, S. Foucault, Philippe A. Tanguy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Engineering & Technology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCavitation Phenomena in Pumps
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsImpellerMixing (physics)Power consumptionTurbineMechanicsDispersion (optics)Non-Newtonian fluidNewtonian fluidFlow (mathematics)Materials sciencePower (physics)Mechanical engineeringThermodynamicsOpticsEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A new mixed down pumping impeller was designed and characterized with both Newtonian and non‐Newtonian fluids in terms of the power consumption and mixing times. A non‐intrusive color‐discoloration technique based on a fast acid‐base reaction was used to determine mixing times and to reveal the presence of both segregated and dead zones at low speed. This new geometry gives similar mixing times to those obtained with a radial turbine but with the power requirements of an axial flow impeller. It was demonstrated that segregated regions formed below the impeller are readily destroyed by the pumping action of this new geometry, while the regions formed above the impeller are destroyed by radial discharge, so that shorter mixing times are obtained. The use of the proposed geometry appears to be a good alternative for mixing applications requiring a good dispersion combined with low power consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.821

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it