MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076438059 · doi:10.1061/41143(394)47

Applications of Artificial Neural Networks in Urban Water System

2010· article· en· W2076438059 on OpenAlexaffabout
Xiangfei Li, Fayi Zhou, Sid Lodewyk

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrological Forecasting Using AI
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombined sewerEnvironmental scienceStormwaterSurface runoffHydrology (agriculture)SnowmeltHydraulicsArtificial neural networkWater qualityUrban runoffRetention basinEnvironmental engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringGeotechnical engineeringMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper summarizes an extensive review on the applicability of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) in urban hydraulics and hydrology. The identified areas for ANN application include rainfall — runoff — sewer flows, snowmelt — runoff-sewer flows, stormwater and Combined Sewer Overflow quality modeling, Total Loading Analysis, and Real Time Control. This paper also introduces the results of two recent ANN applications in City of Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. One is the early warning system for the Enhanced Preliminary Treatment (EPT) facility to treat the wet weather flow at the Goldbar wastewater treatment plant and the other is the prediction of Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) based on monitored rainfall data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrological Forecasting Using AIFrench-language works237,207