MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076449628 · doi:10.2460/javma.2001.218.723

Use of pericardial patch graft reconstruction of the right atrium for treatment of hemangiosarcoma in a dog

2001· article· en· W2076449628 on OpenAlexaff
Brigitte A. Brisson, David L. Holmberg

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeptidase Inhibition and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHemangiosarcomaMedicineRight atriumResectionLeft atriumAtrium (architecture)Atrial AppendageCardiologyPericardiumInternal medicineSurgeryAnatomyAngiosarcomaAtrial fibrillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A n 8-year-old 66-lb (30-kg) sexually intact male Golden Retriever was evaluated by the Veterinary Teaching Hospital at the University of Guelph for weakness, collapse, and dyspnea of 12 hours' duration.Physical examination revealed the dog was weak and unable to walk.The dog was moderately dehydrated (7%), tachycardic (180 beats/min), tachypneic (60 breaths/min), and had weak peripheral pulses and muffled heart sounds.Results of a CBC revealed mild anemia (Hct, 31%; reference range, 38 to 57%), mild hypoproteinemia (48 g/L; reference range, 55 to 76 g/L), and changes consistent with a stress leukogram.Results of biochemical analysis and urinalysis were not notable.Ventricular tachycardia was confirmed electrocardiographically; heart rate varied between 180 and 200 beats/min.Radiography of the thorax revealed mild cardiomegaly, and there was decreased radiographic detail on views of the abdomen.Abdominal ultrasonography revealed hepatic venous congestion and abdominal effusion.Cardiac ultrasonography revealed moderate pericardial effusion, mild right and left atrial enlargement, and mild mitral regurgitation.Pericardiocentesis was performed and yielded 35 ml of sanguineous fluid.The pH of the pericardial fluid was 7.4, and cytologic evaluation revealed evidence of hemorrhage with some reactive mesothelial cells.Abdominocentesis yielded fluid consistent with ascites.Following pericardiocentesis, there was no improvement in the ventricular tachycardia.Treatment consisted of administration of lidocaine (2 mg/kg [0.9 mg/lb] of body weight, IV, followed by a constant rate infusion [30 µg/kg/min (13.6 µg/lb/min), IV]), magnesium sulfate (30 mg/kg [13.6 mg/lb], IV, during a 4hour period), and procainamide (30 µg/kg/min [13.6 µg/lb/min], IV); treatment with these drugs failed to correct the arrhythmia.Further treatment, using sotalol hydrochloride (0.7 mg/kg [0.32 mg/lb], q 12 h), an orally administered class III antiarrhythmic and β-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Veterinary Medical AssociationSame topicPeptidase Inhibition and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207