MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076467205 · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.33462

Paternal isodisomy of chromosome 2 as a cause of long chain 3‐hydroxyacyl‐CoA dehydrogenase (LCHAD) deficiency

2010· article· en· W2076467205 on OpenAlexaff
Berivan Baskin, Michael T. Geraghty, Peter N. Ray

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism and Genetic Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneticsMutationBiologyNewborn screeningGenetic counselingCompound heterozygosityGeneUniparental disomyChromosomeGene mutationKaryotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Long-chain 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency is an autosomal recessive disorder affecting mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation due to mutations in the HADHA gene. We report on a 22-month-old child who was identified on expanded newborn screening with an abnormal acylcarnitine pattern and increased C14OH. Molecular analysis showed that the child was homozygous for the common mutation, c.1526G > C (p.Glu510Gln) in the HADHA gene. Carrier testing on the parental samples revealed that the father was heterozygous for the mutation whereas the mother did not carry the mutation. Short tandem repeat testing with markers covering both short and long arms of chromosome 2 showed that the child has paternal uniparental isodisomy. We highlight the importance of parental testing in cases of homozygosity in autosomal recessive disorders and its impact on genetic counseling of the family.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part ASame topicMetabolism and Genetic DisordersFrench-language works237,207