MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076469583 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2014.2371014

Optimal Model for the Controller Placement Problem in Software Defined Networks

2014· article· en· W2076469583 on OpenAlexaff
Afrim Sallahi, Marc St‐Hilaire

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSolverController (irrigation)Software-defined networkingCloud computingSet (abstract data type)Plan (archaeology)Distributed computingSoftwareMathematical optimizationMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this letter, we propose a mathematical model for the controller placement problem in Software Defined Networks (SDN). More precisely, given a set of switches that must be managed by the controller(s), the model simultaneously determines the optimal number, location, and type of controller(s) as well as the interconnections between all the network elements. The goal of the model is to minimize the cost of the network while considering different constraints. The simulation results show that the model can be used to plan small scale SDN. When trying to solve larger instances of the problem, the solver is taking too much time and also running out of memory. The proposed model could be used by various enterprises and cloud-based networks to start integrating SDN or plan a new SDN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations228
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207