MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076470982 · doi:10.1115/fedsm2009-78268

Flow Around Finite Circular and Square Cylinders in an Open Channel

2009· article· en· W2076470982 on OpenAlexafffund
S. S. Paul, Martin Agelin‐Chaab, Mark F. Tachie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaManitoba Hydro
KeywordsCylinderPotential flow around a circular cylinderTurbulenceSquare (algebra)GeometryParticle image velocimetryOpen-channel flowFlow (mathematics)WakeSaddleMechanicsVortex sheddingVortexPhysicsMathematicsReynolds number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An experimental investigation was performed to study the structure of the flow field around finite circular and square cylinders in a water channel. Detailed velocity measurements using a particle image velocimetry (PIV) system and proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) analysis were conducted to examine the structures in the near-wake region. Iso-contours and profiles of mean velocities and some turbulent quantities at various streamwise locations were reported. The proper orthogonal decomposition was applied to provide insight into the structure of the flow. The results show that the vortex in the square cylinder is bigger and extends to cover part of the free end of the cylinder. There is also an up-wash flow from the base of the cylinders to form saddle points. The saddle point in the square cylinder is closer to the free end than in the circular cylinder. The low order reconstructed turbulent intensities from POD show that the square cylinder has more large scale structures than the circular cylinder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.294
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFluid Dynamics and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207