Novel Amphiphilic Diblock Copolymer of Low Molecular Weight Poly(<i>N</i>-vinylpyrrolidone)-<i>b</i><i>lock</i>-poly(<scp>d</scp>,<scp>l</scp>-lactide): Synthesis, Characterization, and Micellization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Low molecular weight poly( N -vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) with a hydroxyl group at one end was successfully synthesized by free radical polymerization of N -vinyl-2-pyrrolidone (NVP). Using isopropyl alcohol as solvent and 2-mercaptoethanol as chain transfer agent, a control over molecular weight (MW) profile of PVP was obtained, leading to average-number MW as low as 2500 Da and polydispersity indexes close to 1.5. MALDI−TOF mass spectrometry indicated that the insertion of hydroxyl group on one chain end was quantitative. Hydroxyl-terminated PVP was used as macroinitiator in ring-opening polymerization of d, l -lactide yielding amphiphilic poly( N -vinylpyrrolidone)- block -poly( d, l -lactide) (PVP- b -PDLLA) diblock copolymer with polydispersity indexes as low as 1.14. PDLLA contents could be tuned according to the feed ratio of DLLA, leading to molar percents up to 47%. The well-defined diblock copolymer self-assembles into micelles in aqueous solution. Polymeric micelles, composed of PVP- b -PDLLA with PVP M n of 2500 and PDLLA molar content of 45%, displayed monodispersed size distribution of about 40 nm. The critical association concentration of micelles was determined to be around 6 mg/L.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".