Dynamic Viscoelastic Behavior of High Pressure Treated Soybean Protein Isolate Dispersions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Commercial soy protein isolate (SPI) dispersions (10, 15, and 20% concentrations) were subjected to high pressure treatment at selected pressure levels (350, 450, 550, and 650 MPa) for 15 minutes at 23 ± 1.5°C. Calorimetric studies confirmed denaturation of SPI dispersions at 350 MPa irrespective of concentration. Frequency sweep data (0.1 to 10 Hz) of SPI dispersions during oscillation rheological measurement demonstrated that elastic modulus (G′) predominate over viscous component (G″) for all concentrations. Gel rigidity of pressurized samples, estimated by mechanical spectra analysis, showed no systematic pattern with applied pressure however concentration significantly increased mechanical strength. Contrary to thermal effect, high pressure treated samples exhibited predominant viscous property and overall there was no significant change on viscoelastic properties of treated samples to control. Electrophoresis results (both Native and SDS) confirmed rheological data with insignificant conformational change in protein subunits of post-process samples. As expected, thermal induced gel was firmer than that of pressure treated samples at similar concentration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it