MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Influence of Mixing Parameters on the Density and Compaction Behavior of Carbon Anodes Used in Aluminum Production

2011· article· en· W2076535348 on OpenAlexafffund
Kamran Azari, Houshang Alamdari, Hany R. Ammar, Mario Fafard, Angelique Adams, Donald Ziegler

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced materials research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBauxite Residue and Utilization
Canadian institutionsAlcoa (Canada)Université Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsCompactionMixing (physics)Materials scienceAnodePorosityPetroleum cokeRaw materialVolume (thermodynamics)Composite materialMetallurgyAluminiumCalcinationCarbon fibersElectrolysisCokeComposite numberElectrodeChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current study investigates the effects of mixing parameters on the quality of anode paste and green anode used in aluminum electrolysis. Four mixing times and four mixing temperatures were applied to prepare anode pastes using calcined petroleum coke and coal tar pitch, as raw materials. The volume of the pores in the paste was used as the indicator for mixing effectiveness. A compression test was applied to the pastes to study the compactability of these pastes and to investigate the effect of mixing parameters on density of the green samples. It was shown that mixing parameters influence the size, volume and surface area of paste porosity and also its compaction behaviour.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced materials researchSame topicBauxite Residue and UtilizationFrench-language works237,207