MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076543482 · doi:10.1139/e05-007

UPb zircon geochronology and Nd isotope geochemistry of Proterozoic granitoids in the western Churchill Province: intrusive age pattern and Archean source domains

2005· article· en· W2076543482 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
O. van Breemen, T D Peterson, H A Sandeman

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsNunavut Research InstituteGovernment of NunavutGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZirconGeologyGeochemistryArcheanGeochronologyProterozoicIgneous rockMaficPlutonismCrustPlutonPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hudsonian tectonism in the western Churchill Province of Canada encompassed two periods of granitic plutonism. The Hudson suite plutons represent xenocryst-rich, mainly monzogranitic, near-minimum melts emplaced near their source region in thickened middle crust; the Nueltin syenogranites and Pitz rhyolites were generated by intrusion of basalt into extending crust. Zircons from four Nueltin suite samples and 20 Hudson suite samples were analysed by U–Pb SHRIMP techniques. Intrusion of the Hudson suite lasted ca. 50 million years, from 1845 to 1795 Ma, with a peak around 1825 Ma, and the Nueltin suite from 1765 to 1750 Ma, following a ca. 30-million-year period of magmatic quiescence. A marked contrast in Th/U ratios was found in igneous zircon from Hudson suite samples south (Th/U = 0.066) and north (Th/U = 1.07) of the northern margin of the Central Hearne domain and is attributed to a difference in the nature of the melting process, with the lower values representing ultrametamorphism and the higher values representing bulk melting resulting from contact with mafic igneous magma. Whole-rock Nd isotopic measurements, with average ε143Nd near –10, indicate a dominant late Archean crustal component in both suites of granites, reflected by numerous inherited zircon ages between 2720 and 2650 Ma in Hudson granites. Further south, along the Manitoba border, inherited zircons of 3500–3000 Ma, together with previously published U–Pb data on gneisses and ca. 3 Ga TDM model ages of Hudson granites, indicate the presence of middle to early Archean crust.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207