MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Los empresarios del vino en chile y su aporte a la transformación de la agricultura, de 1870 a 1930

2004· article· es· W2076614125 on OpenAlex
José Luís del Pozo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversum · 2004
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicLogistics and Transportation Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artículo analiza el caso de los principales propietarios agrícolas, especializados en la producción de vino en Chile central, durante el período de 1870 a 1930. Se estudia las razones que llevaron a esos empresarios a invertir en el vino, ya que en su gran mayoría no eran agricultores. Posteriormente, se hace la distinción entre los productores, todos de familias chilenas, y los distribuidores, que fueron en su enorme mayoría inmigrantes, sobre todo catalanes. Finalmente, se discute la cuestión del aporte a la "modernización" de la agricultura de esa época, concluyéndose que si bien hubo una renovación tecnológica importante, esa transformación no llegó al nivel social, ya que los viñateros mantuvieron las antiguas relaciones de producción, que implicaba un tipo de trabajo no siempre enmarcado en la economía salarial, se opusieron a la aplicación de las leyes del trabajo y no innovaron en el sistema de administración de las empresas, que siguieron siendo organizadas como un negocio familiar.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it