MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076662087 · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001022

A Call for Action: The Application of the International Health Regulations to the Global Threat of Antimicrobial Resistance

2011· article· en· W2076662087 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Didier Wernli, Thomas Haustein, John Conly, Yehuda Carmeli, Ilona Kickbusch, Stéphan Harbarth

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS Medicine · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut de Veille SanitaireUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsCall to actionUnit (ring theory)Action (physics)Global healthMedicinePolitical scienceResistance (ecology)Infection controlPublic healthPublic relationsEconomic growthFamily medicineBusinessNursingPsychologyPathologyEconomicsMarketingBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Policy Forum allows health policy makers around the world to discuss challenges

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.064
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.098
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.337

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0640.098
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.006
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0120.043
Scholarly communication0.0200.033
Open science0.0070.018
Research integrity0.1350.101
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations87
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS MedicineSame topicAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaFrench-language works237,207