MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Photosynthesis, immediate export and carbon partitioning in source leaves of C<sub>3</sub>, C<sub>3</sub>‐C<sub>4</sub> intermediate, and C<sub>4</sub><i>Panicum</i> and <i>Flaveria</i> species at ambient and elevated CO<sub>2</sub> levels

2000· article· en· W2076662965 on OpenAlexafffund
Evangelos D. Leonardos, Bernard Grodzinski

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Cell & Environment · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant responses to elevated CO2
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of GeorgiaWashington State University
KeywordsPhotosynthesisPanicumStarchBotanyBiologyChemistryFood science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Immediate export in leaves of C3‐C4 intermediates were compared with their C3 and C4 relatives within the Panicum and Flaveria genera. At 35 Pa CO2, photosynthesis and export were highest in C4 species in each genera. Within the Panicum, photosynthesis and export in ‘type I’ C3‐C4 intermediates were greater than those in C3 species. However, ‘type I’ C3‐C4 intermediates exported a similar proportion of newly fixed 14C as did C4 species. Within the Flaveria, ‘type II’ C3‐C4 intermediate species had the lowest export rather than the C3 species. At ambient CO2, immediate export was strongly correlated with photosynthesis. However, at 90 Pa CO2, when photosynthesis and immediate export increased in all C3 and C3‐C4 intermediate species, proportionally less C was exported in all photosynthetic types than that at ambient CO2. All species accumulated starch and sugars at both CO2 levels. There was no correlation between immediate export and the pattern of 14C‐labelling into sugars and starch among the photosynthetic types within each genus. However, during CO2 enrichment, C4Panicum species accumulated sugars above the level of sugars and starch normally made at ambient CO2, whereas the C4Flaveria species accumulated only additional starch.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.165
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant Cell & EnvironmentSame topicPlant responses to elevated CO2French-language works237,207