Comparative Study on Growth, Feed Consumption and Survival of Spiral Babylon <i>Babylonia spirata</i> Linnaeus, 1758 (Mollusca: Gastropoda) Fed with Formulated Diets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A growth trial was conducted to determine the effects of the dietary protein level on growth, feed utilization and survival of Babylonia spirata . The triplicate groups of 50 animals (with an initial average weight of 49.24 +0.8 g) were stocked in 50-l tanks and fed to apparent satiation twice daily for three months with two experimental diets of 30% and 40% protein content and control diet of fresh meat clam. The growth of snails that were fed with natural food was not significantly (P 0.05) in growth and FCR between snails that were fed with experimental diets. The result of the present study indicates that a diet containing 30% and 40% of protein content may be recommended for the growth of B. spirata .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".