MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2076675291 · doi:10.7202/027841ar

Les effets rétroactifs d’une décision arbitrale et l’action unilatérale de l’employeur

2005· article· fr· W2076675291 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fernand Morin

Bibliographic record

VenueRelations industrielles · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La corporation municipale est-elle un employeur à « statut particulier » ? Dans quelle mesure peut-elle modifier de son propre chef les conditions de travail ? La Cour supérieure nous apporte quelques éléments de réponse.1 Puisque dans ces deux affaires, les principaux événements sont les mêmes, il convient de les rappeler en premier lieu puis, de rapporter les éléments particuliers à chacun. (1) Syndicat professionnel des policiers et pompiers de la Cité de Shawinigan Inc., vs. La Cité de Shawinigan, C.S. no 895 et no 1,119 (district de St-Maurice), respectivement du 5 et du 7 juillet 1967, par l'honorable Jean-Jacques Bédard, J.C.S.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.040
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.117
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0400.117
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0060.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.220
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRelations industrielles→Same topicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender→French-language works237,207→