MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076693815 · doi:10.3917/riej.073.0009

L'économicité dans les discours du droit

2015· article· fr· W2076693815 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean-François Boudet

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue interdisciplinaire d études juridiques · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le débat sur l’obtention rationalisée de résultats bénéfiques pour les collectivités mérite d’être ouvertement posé dans le contexte actuel de crises des dettes privées et publiques, au-delà des logiques de performance. Faisant partie du vocabulaire administratif (notamment celui de la santé) en Suisse, au Canada ou en Belgique, l’économicité entend ainsi dépasser la simple rationalité économique et le seul constat de la rareté en droit public pour promouvoir une meilleure combinaison des coûts et des rendements, non pas du service public, mais des services publics. Dans cette perspective, l’économicité peut être hissée au rang de principe et d’une notion à partir de laquelle s’établissent des raisonnements juridiques. En tant que telle, elle est appréhendée comme un outil au service des politiques publiques, détenant ainsi les clefs pour un renouvellement de l’entreprise anthropomorphiste du droit, et par là, de l’action de l’Etat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.428
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue interdisciplinaire d études juridiquesSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207