MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076701911 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2010.5537254

Peak-to-peak jitter reduction technique for the Free-Running Period Synthesizer (FRPS)

2010· article· en· W2076701911 on OpenAlexafffund
Marcel Siadjine Njinowa, Hung Tien Bui, François-Raymond Boyer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsJitterField-programmable gate arrayDigital-to-analog converterComputer scienceReduction (mathematics)Electronic engineeringVoltageElectrical engineeringComputer hardwareMathematicsEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many applications require clock generators to synthesize accurate signals with high frequencies and very low jitter. In this paper, we present a standard-cell module to reduce jitter observed in the Free-Running Period Synthesizer (FRPS). This jitter is due to the required variation in period duration in order to obtain a precise frequency. The basic principle of the proposed design is to anticipate the occurrence of this change in period and generate an analog voltage at that point using a standard-cell digital-to-analog converter (DAC). Compared to the original FRPS, the proposed technique reduces the deterministic jitter by a factor of up to 2N, where N is the number of bits in the DAC. The system was implemented on a Cyclone II FPGA along with discrete components and experimental results confirm that the proposed system works as expected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207