MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076703708 · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/38/40/003

Adsorbing bargraph paths in a<i>q</i>-wedge

2005· article· en· W2076703708 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics A Mathematical and General · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrostatics and Colloid Interactions
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWedge (geometry)GeologyMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Consider a model of partially directed paths from the origin in the square lattice, constrained to the region between the Y-axis and the line Y = qX, and ending in a vertex in this line (with coordinates of the form (N, Nq), and where q > 0 is an integer). Such paths are bargraph paths in a q-wedge. In this paper the adsorption of bargraph paths in the line Y = qX is examined. This model has generating function gq(t, z) where t is the edge generating variable and z is the generating variable of visits of the path to the line Y = qX. It is proven that the model undergoes an adsorption transition at the critical value of zq and that zq is given asymptotically by In other words, zq/q is given to decaying terms. Moreover, adsorbing bargraph paths in a 1/p-wedge between the Y-axis and the line Y = (1/p)X, where p > 0 is an integer, are also considered. In these models it is shown that z1/p ≃ p2/2 log p2 for large p.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.346
Threshold uncertainty score0.287

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it