MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076706358 · doi:10.1016/j.molonc.2012.01.001

Structural and genic characterization of stable genomic regions in breast cancer: Relevance to chemotherapy

2012· article· en· W2076706358 on OpenAlexafffund
Nicole I. Park, Peter K. Rogan, Heather E. Tarnowski, Joan H.M. Knoll

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Oncology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
FundersSchulich School of Medicine and DentistryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsCompute CanadaLondon Health Sciences Centre
KeywordsCopy-number variationBiologyCopy number analysisGene dosageGeneComparative genomic hybridizationBreast cancerGeneticsGenomeGene duplicationCancerGene expression profilingComputational biologyGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Cancer genomes accumulate frequent and diverse chromosomal abnormalities as well as gene mutations but must maintain the ability to survive in vivo. We hypothesize that genetic selection acts to maintain tumour survival by preserving copy number of specific genes and genomic regions. Genomic regions and genes that remain unaltered in copy number and expression, respectively, may be essential for maintaining tumour survival. METHODS: We analyzed copy number data of 243 previously reported breast tumours and computationally derived stable copy number regions. To identify genes in stable copy number regions with nominal changes in expression, datasets for tumour and normal samples were compared. Results were replicated by analysis of a series of independent copy number, expression and genomic sequencing studies. A subset of stable regions, including stable paralogous regions, were confirmed by quantitative PCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in 5 breast cancer cell lines. We deduced a comprehensive set of dually stable genes (i.e. maintaining nominal copy number and expression) which were categorized according to pathway and ontology assignments. The stability of genes encoding therapeutic drug targets was also assessed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Tumour genome analysis revealed 766 unstable (amplified and/or deleted) and 812 stable contiguous genomic regions. Replication analysis of an independent set of 171 breast tumours confirmed copy number stability of 1.3 Gb of the genome. We found that 5804 of these genes were dually stable. The composition of this gene set remained essentially unchanged (<2% reduction) after accounting for commonly mutated breast cancer genes found by sequencing and differential expression. The stable breast cancer genome is enriched for cellular metabolism, regulation of gene expression, DNA packaging (chromatin and nucleosome assembly), and regulation of apoptosis functions. Stable genes participating in multiple essential pathways were consistently found to be targets of chemotherapies. Preservation of stable, essential genes may be related to the effectiveness of certain chemotherapeutic agents that act on multiple gene products in this set.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular OncologySame topicGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesFrench-language works237,207