Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 1980, Pope John Paul II talked to official representatives of the Jewish community in Mainz about the covenant with the Jewish people "which has never been revoked." The notion of the "covenant never revoked" is referred to again in the Vatican "Notes" of 1985, and frequently since then. This article concerns itself with integrating the new teaching of the "covenant with the Jewish people never revoked" into a comprehensive Christian view of the world. Such an integration into explicit Church teaching entails a paradigm shift as well as repentance and teshuvah. First, I will discuss paradigm shifts and the process of teshuvah, and then I will look at different paradigms wherein Jesus Christ is presented in a range of worldviews ranging from an exclusive Christology in which there is salvation in no other name to theocentric paradigms that attempt to include "the other," that is, the nonbaptized. I will conclude with suggestions for future action. Since the Shoah, and with the publication of Nostra Aetate
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.047 | 0.049 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.016 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".