Cellular biomechanics in the lung
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mechanical forces affect both the function and phenotype of cells in the lung. In this symposium, recent studies were presented that examined several aspects of biomechanics in lung cells and their relationship to disease. Wound healing and recovery from injury in the airways involve epithelial cell spreading and migration on a substrate that undergoes cyclic mechanical deformation; enhanced green fluorescent protein-actin was used in a stable cell line to examine cytoskeletal changes in airway epithelial cells during wound healing. Eosinophils migrate into the airways during asthmatic attacks and can also be exposed to cyclic mechanical deformation; cyclic mechanical stretch caused a decrease in leukotriene C(4) synthesis that may be dependent on mechanotransduction mechanisms involving the production of reactive oxygen species. Recent studies have suggested that proinflammatory cytokines are increased in ventilator-induced lung injury and may be elevated by overdistention of the lung tissue; microarray analysis of human lung epithelial cells demonstrated that cyclic mechanical stretch alone profoundly affects gene expression. Finally, airway hyperresponsiveness is a basic feature of asthma, but the relationship between airway hyperresponsiveness and changes in airway smooth muscle (ASM) function remain unclear. New analysis of the behavior of the ASM cytoskeleton (CSK) suggests, however, that the CSK may behave as a glassy material and that glassy behavior may account for the extensive ASM plasticity and remodeling that contribute to airway hyperresponsiveness. Together, the presentations at this symposium demonstrated the remarkable and varied roles that mechanical forces may play in both normal lung physiology as well as pathophysiology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".