Bibliographic record
Abstract
Évolution de la recherche empirique sur l'interprétation de conférence — Dans un historique de la recherche sur l'interprétation, les années 90 correspondent à une période de renouveau après une prise de conscience (années 50 et 60), une période expérimentale (années 65 à 75) et une période de stagnation due au protectionnisme de certains praticiens au pouvoir (75 à fin des années 80). Ce renouveau se traduit par une plus grande ouverture interdisciplinaire et inter-centres et par une sensibilisation à la recherche empirique, mais celle-ci reste faible : les chercheurs, surtout des interprètes-enseignants, sont peu nombreux et n'ont pas été formés à la recherche et aux disciplines cognitives pertinentes; les centres sont peu nombreux, petits, dispersés et sans infrastructure institutionnelle. Les perspectives d'évolution restent incertaines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".