Inhibition of homologous recombination by variants of the catalytic subunit of the DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PKcs)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two major DNA double-strand break repair pathways exist in all eukaryotes, nonhomologous DNA end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). Although both pathways can function throughout the cell cycle, NHEJ predominates in G0/G1) (when a replicated sister chromatid is unavailable), whereas HR makes a more substantial contribution in S and G2. How a cell chooses between these two important DNA repair pathways is largely unknown. DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) is critical for NHEJ. Here, we describe two conserved splice variants of a catalytic subunit of DNA-PK (DNA-PKcs) that are expressed predominately in nondividing cells. Although both encode stable products, neither reverses the NHEJ defects in DNA-PKcs-deficient cells. In fact, cells expressing one of the DNA-PKcs variants are slightly more radiosensitive than cells completely deficient in DNA-PKcs. We investigated whether cells expressing the DNA-PKcs variants had any other DNA repair deficits and found that these cells are considerably more sensitive to both etoposide and mitomycin C than cells that express no DNA-PKcs at all. Because repair of DNA damage induced by these two agents requires intact HR, we tested whether the NHEJ-defective variants of DNA-PKcs inhibit double-strand break-induced HR in an integrated substrate. In cells expressing the NHEJ-defective variants, HR was markedly reduced. Because the splice variants are expressed highly only in nondividing cells, quiescent cells would be afforded a mechanism to inhibit repair by means of HR when sister chromatids are not available as templates for accurate repair with low risk of genome rearrangement, thereby enhancing genome stability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".