MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076771396 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2012.2210730

Wideband CMOS Amplification Stage for a Direct-Sampling Square Kilometre Array Receiver

2012· article· en· W2076771396 on OpenAlexaff
Donuwan Navaratne, Leonid Belostotski

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCMOSAmplifierNoise figureWidebandElectrical engineeringNoise (video)Low-noise amplifierPhysicsElectronic engineeringAutomatic gain controlSampling (signal processing)Computer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The design of a second amplification stage (SAS) for a highly sensitive direct-sampling receiver for the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) radio synthesis telescope is discussed. The SAS is intended to follow a Square Kilometre Array low-noise amplifier (SKA-LNA), which is being designed by others and is not a subject of this study, to obtain the high gain required from the SKA receiver. Due to the SKA ultra-low noise-temperature requirements, the SAS noise must be minimized, even though it is preceded by an SKA-LNA. The first two stages of the SAS consist of an inductorless partially noise-canceling resistive-feedback amplifier and a differential gain stage that achieve both low noise figures (NFs) and convert the single-ended input signal to a differential output. Following this, an additional gain stage is cascaded to increase the SAS gain. Over the midband SKA frequency range of 0.7-1.4 GHz, a 65-nm CMOS SAS achieves an S21>; 34 dB, voltage gain >;36 dB, and sub-1-dB NFs (~75-K noise temperature), P1dB of >; -52 dBm, input third-order intercept point (IP3) of >;-43 dBm and input second-order intercept point (IP2) of >;-34 dBm, while consuming 96.8 mW of dc power. While the proposed SAS is not required to be input power matched, a method for matching with minimum effect on NF and gain is also presented and experimentally verified. The power match SAS achieves an S21>;26dB, voltage gain >;35 dB, and sub-1.6-dB NFs (~130-K noise temperature), input P1dB of >;-52 dBm, input IP3 of >;-44 dBm, and input IP2 of >;-34 dBm, while consuming 58.9 mW of dc power.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207