Globalization and Neoliberalism: A Taxonomy and Some Implications for Anti-Globalization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The term “neoliberal globalization” has become a common one in both academic discourse and in the NGOs and social movements that are typically referred to as the “anti-globalization” movement. However, the concept of neoliberal globalization—and the relationship between Neoliberalism and globalization—is not straightforward. The reason for this that the term “globalization” has been interpreted in a variety of ways, each with its own implications for this is that the term “globalization” has been interpreted in a variety of ways, each with its own implications for the relationship to Neoliberalism. This essay provides a taxonomy of approaches to globalization. Four approaches are identified and differentiated by the relationship that each posits between states and markets. The role assigned to Neoliberalism in each of these four approaches is explained. The article concludes with a sketch of what this implies for our understanding of the anti-globalization movement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.010 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.065 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.019 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".