Deformable registration using scale space keypoints
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we describe a new methodology for keypoint-based affine and deformable medical image registration. This fast and computationally efficient method is automatic and does not rely on segmentation of images. The keypoint pixels used in this technique are extreme points in the scale space and are characterized by descriptor vectors which summarize the intensity gradient profile of the surrounding pixels. For each of the keypoints in the scene image, a corresponding keypoint is identified in the model image using the feature space nearest neighbor criteria. For deformable registration, B-splines are used to extrapolate a regular deformation grid for all of the pixels in the scene image based on the relative displacement vectors of the corresponding pairs. This approach results in a fast and accurate registration in the brain MRI images (an average target registration error of less than 2mm was acquired). We have also studied the affine registration problem in the liver ultrasound and brain MRI images and have acquired acceptable registrations using a mean square solution for affine parameters based on only around 30 corresponding keypoint pairs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it