MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076820182 · doi:10.1080/00207170902736307

Adaptive control of system involving complex hysteretic nonlinearities: a generalised Prandtl–Ishlinskii modelling approach

2009· article· en· W2076820182 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Control · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPiezoelectric Actuators and Control
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersHigher Education Discipline Innovation Project
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemHysteresisTrajectoryController (irrigation)InversePrandtl numberStability (learning theory)Adaptive controlInverse dynamicsTracking (education)MathematicsControl (management)Computer sciencePhysicsArtificial intelligenceClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article an adaptive control approach is proposed for a class of nonlinear systems preceded by unknown hysteretic nonlinearities, which is described by a generalised Prandtl–Ishlinskii (P-I) model. The main feature is that the generalised P-I hysteresis model is counted in the controller design without constructing a hysteresis inverse. The developed controller guarantees the global stability of the system and tracking a desired trajectory to a certain precision is achieved. The effectiveness of the proposed control approach is demonstrated through simulation example.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.829

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it