MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076844267 · doi:10.1109/mascots.2014.27

Provisioning of Computing Resources for Web Applications under Time-Varying Traffic

2014· article· en· W2076844267 on OpenAlexaff
Ali M. Rajabi, J.W. Wong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAdvanced Queuing Theory Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProvisioningComputer scienceWorkloadErlang (programming language)Queueing theoryDistributed computingBenchmark (surveying)Computer networkPoisson distributionWeb applicationQueueMarkov processReal-time computingOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Provisioning computing resources for a web application poses a challenge due to the time-varying nature of the application workload. We consider an environment where a subscriber acquires computing resources from an infrastructure provider to deploy a transactional web application. The objective is to acquire sufficient resources to meet a performance target given by Pr[response time ≤ x] ≥ β. Markov-modulated Poisson process (MMPP) has been shown to effectively model time-varying traffic. It has also been shown that service times can be characterized by a hyper-Erlang (HE) distribution. HE is a special case of the phase-type (PH) distribution. We model the application by an MMPP/PH/1 queue and use analytic results of this model to determine the required capacity to meet a given performance target over an extended period of time. An implementation of the TPC-W benchmark is used to verify the effectiveness of the model. We also investigate the relationship between the required capacity and workload parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Queuing Theory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207