MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076856161 · doi:10.1081/lpr-120039660

Transendothelial Movement of Liposomes In Vitro Mediated by Cancer Cells, Neutrophils or Histamine

2004· article· en· W2076856161 on OpenAlex
Felicia Antohe, Lei Lin, G. Y. KAO, Mark J. Poznansky, Theresa M. Allen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Liposome Research · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical TrialsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiposomeHistamineIn vitroChemotaxisCancer cellBiophysicsMonolayerChemistryCell biologyCancerBiologyPharmacologyBiochemistryReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A two-chamber culture system has been used to examine the ability of small liposomes to cross an endothelial cell barrier in response to various stimuli. Transendothelial transit of liposomes was almost negligible in the presence of intact, healthy endothelial cells (EC). Addition of histamine induced a concentration-dependent increase in the movement of liposomes across the EC monolayer. In the presence of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs), migrating in response to a chemotactic gradient of N-Formil-Met-Leu-Phe (fMLP), both liposomes and IgG crossed EC monolayer by a paracellular pathway, largely independent of an association with the PMNs. The presence of cancer cell, growing in the lower chamber or the presence of cancer cell-conditioned media, also resulted in the passage of liposome across the EC. We conclude that EC monolayers are sufficiently disrupted by several physiologically relevant stimuli to allow for the transendothelial passage of liposomes. These results have important implications for the therapeutic use of liposome in the treatment of cancer or other inflammatory processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.816

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it