MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076858443 · doi:10.1109/tsp.2014.2302733

Design of IIR Digital Differentiators Using Constrained Optimization

2014· article· en· W2076858443 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfinite impulse responsePassbandStopbandDifferentiatorControl theory (sociology)2D FiltersAmplitudeTransition bandLinear phaseComputer scienceDigital filterMathematicsLow-pass filterFilter (signal processing)Band-pass filterElectronic engineeringPrototype filterPhysicsEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new optimization method for the design of fullband and lowpass IIR digital differentiators is proposed. In the new method, the passband phase-response error is minimized under the constraint that the maximum passband amplitude-response relative error is below a prescribed level. For lowpass IIR differentiators, an additional constraint is introduced to limit the average squared amplitude response in the stopband so as to minimize any high-frequency noise that may be present. Extensive experimental results are included, which show that the differentiators designed using the proposed method have much smaller maximum phase-response error for the same passband amplitude-response error and stopband constraints when compared with several differentiators designed using state-of-the-art competing methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score0.930

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it