MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076859827 · doi:10.1021/ef0602630

Agglomeration and Deposition of Coke during Cracking of Petroleum Vacuum Residue

2006· article· en· W2076859827 on OpenAlexaff
Weidong Bi, William C. McCaffrey, Murray R. Gray

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCokePetroleum cokeChemical engineeringCrackingNucleationCarbonizationGraphiteChemistryCarbon fibersYield (engineering)Materials scienceEconomies of agglomerationMetallurgyOrganic chemistryAdsorptionComposite materialComposite number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrophobic fine solids can reduce the yield of toluene-insoluble coke in thermal cracking of heavy oils at short reaction times. In this work, fine carbon solids were used as additives in the coking of Arab heavy-vacuum residue (AHVR) in 1-methylnaphthalene (1-MN) to study the mechanism of this interaction. Both mesophase carbon and spherical graphite particles significantly reduced the coke yield compared with the case of no solid addition. Coke deposited on the surfaces of the two hydrophobic additives. This nucleation of coke deposition on the solid reduced the agglomeration of the coke, giving a better dispersion in the liquid. The highly dispersed coke phase on fine solids was more accessible for reactions with hydrogen-donor compounds in the oil phase, which in turn inhibited the initial rate of coke formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207