MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076978053 · doi:10.1093/tandt/12.4.18

Trust in arbitration

2006· article· en· W2076978053 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTrusts & Trustees · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInternational Arbitration and Investment Law
Canadian institutionsNortel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProbateArbitrationLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trust in arbitration Get access Charles Lloyd, Charles Lloyd Contentious Trust and Probate Group, Macfarlanes10 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1BD Tel. +44 (0)20 7831 9222 Fax +44 (0)20 7831 9607 E-mail: charles.lloyd@macfarlanes.comwww.macfarlanes.com Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Jonathan Pratt Jonathan Pratt Contentious Trust and Probate Group, Macfarlanes10 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1BD Tel. +44 (0)20 7831 9222 Fax +44 (0)20 7831 9607 E-mail: jonathan.pratt@macfarlanes.comwww.macfarlanes.com Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Trusts & Trustees, Volume 12, Issue 4, March 2006, Pages 18–20, https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/12.4.18 Published: 01 March 2006

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.822
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it