MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076990191 · doi:10.3828/bhs.81.4.6

No History to Absolve Them: Spanish-American Revolutionary Discourse after 1990

2004· article· en· W2076990191 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Hispanic Studies · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American Literature Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdeologySacrificeIdeal (ethics)CompromiseLiberalismNationalismHumanitiesHistoryPhilosophyArtPolitical sciencePoliticsLawTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Identifying 1990 as an historical watershed, this article studies the erosion of the Spanish American revolutionary's reliance on historical references rooted in an implicitly book-based culture as a justification for revolutionary violence. The argument takes as its point of departure Fidel Castro's speech 'La historia me absolverá' and traces how the understanding of history shared by Spanish American revolutionaries of the 1960s promoted an ideal of self-sacrifice. The Nicaraguan Revolution adopted these ideals of discipline, martyrdom and self-denial, but used them to promote a more overtly nationalist revolutionary agenda. Events after 1990 made the ideal of self-sacrifice more difficult to sustain. The article closes with an examination of the attempt of Subcomandante Marcos of the Zapatista movement to reinvent the revolutionary persona in an egalitarian, visually based postmodern culture, finding in Marcos's ideology a deeper compromise with Western liberalism than was visible in the writings of his predecessors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.786
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it