Phononic band gap crystals with periodic fractal inclusions: Theoretical study using numerical analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A numerical study is conducted using finite difference time-domain analysis to determine the impact of periodic fractal-shaped inclusions on the frequency response of two-dimensional phononic or acoustic band gap crystals. Both solid host with solid inclusions and solid host with fluid inclusions were studied with increasing fractal order iteration or increasing fractal dimensionality for different types of fractals generated from square inclusions in a square lattice formation. Solid-fluid systems showed marked changes in frequency response including increasing multiplicity of bands compared to regular square inclusion shapes. Fractal inclusions in the solid host/fluid inclusion systems studied exhibited the ability to provide band gaps for much longer wavelengths than those of the solid host/solid inclusion systems studied. This behavior was attributed to the possibility of resonant localization effects that a fractal fluid inclusion can exhibit compared to fractal solid inclusions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it