MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076999819 · doi:10.1080/15325000500360827

A New and Efficient Approach for Analysis of a Saturated Synchronous Generator Under the Load Rejection Test

2006· article· en· W2076999819 on OpenAlexaff
R. Wamkeue, Innocent Kamwa, Frederic Baetscher, Joseph El Hayek

Bibliographic record

VenueElectric Power Components and Systems · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalHydro-QuébecUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoad rejectionPermanent magnet synchronous generatorArmature (electrical engineering)Control theory (sociology)Synchronous motorSaturation (graph theory)Shunt generatorVoltageElectric power systemGenerator (circuit theory)EngineeringComputer scienceMathematicsElectromagnetic coilElectrical engineeringPhysicsPower (physics)Mechanical engineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with an original analysis behind the load rejection tests on the synchronous generator. The analysis is based on a generalized linear electromechanical hybrid state-space synchronous machine model. The dynamic k-factor cross-saturation theory for anisotropic machines is used to account for iron saturation. The paper also describes the test setup and assesses the new approach with actual data. Several load rejection tests are performed with various types of load for predicting the dynamic performance of a 208-V, 5.4-kVA, 4-pole, 60-Hz saturated synchronous generator. The results obtained reveal that field current and armature voltage transients are greatly influenced by the iron saturation and type of load during load rejection tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectric Power Components and SystemsSame topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207