MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077022586 · doi:10.1139/p01-110

Anomalous behavior in a three-dimensional frustrated itinerant electron magnet

2001· article· en· W2077022586 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Makoto Isoda, Shigeyoshi Mori

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsCondensed matter physicsReciprocal latticeInelastic neutron scatteringElectronDegenerate energy levelsNeutron scatteringQuantum mechanicsNeutron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a simple microscopic theory for the magnetic and electronic properties of a three-dimensional frustrated itinerant electron magnet. Based on the single-band Hubbard model, it is investigated in the weak-correlation limit at a half-filling on the pyrochlore lattice. A doubly-degenerate flat band in the bare spectrum emerges as a character of the fully frustrated geometry. The random-phase-approximation dynamical susceptibility reproduces some characters in the low-frequency regime that were found in the neutron inelastic-scattering experiment of the cubic Laves compound Y(Sc)Mn2, especially in the spectral intensity distribution in the reciprocal space and in the almost irrelevant feature of the distribution to frequency. The quasi-particle self-energy shows a peculiarity, resulting from an anomalous frequency dependence in the non-interacting dynamical susceptibility, and then it leads to the breakdown of the Fermi-liquid picture. PACS No.: 75.25+z

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207