MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077044703 · doi:10.1109/jqe.2006.887176

Controlling a Semiconductor Optical Amplifier Using a State-Space Model

2007· article· en· W2077044703 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonlinear systemPhotonicsControl theory (sociology)AmplifierOptical amplifierState-space representationOptical switchState spaceComputer scienceElectronic engineeringPhysicsOpticsOptoelectronicsControl (management)LaserEngineeringCMOSMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We derive nonlinear and linear state-space control models for a multichannel semiconductor optical amplifier. Verified against the governing partial differential equations through simulation, the linear model tracks modulations up to 20% qualitatively well. Linear feedback control is then employed to design two interchannel crosstalk suppressing systems, one using state feedback into the electronic drive current and the other using optical output feedback into an optical control channel; the controller designed with the linear model is seen to work well even with 100% modulations of the nonlinear system. This linear state-space model opens the way for further robust analysis, design and control of integrated active photonic circuits

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.388
Threshold uncertainty score0.884

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it