MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077063846 · doi:10.1139/v02-119

Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of substituted aryl- and hetarylmethyl phosphonate and phosphate UMP derivatives as potential glucosyltransferase inhibitors

2002· article· en· W2077063846 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Asish K. Bhattacharya, Florian Stolz, Jürgen Kurzeck, Wolfgang Rüger, Richard R. Schmidt

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCarbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftDeutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
KeywordsChemistryGlucosyltransferaseStereochemistryPhosphonateEnzymeTransition state analogUridineIn vitroGlucosyltransferasesArylMoleculeDerivative (finance)Combinatorial chemistryBiochemistryActive siteOrganic chemistryRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The enzyme β (1[Formula: see text]4)-glucosyltransferase (BGT) catalyses the transfer of glucose from uridine diphosphoglucose (UDP-Glc) to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-HMC) bases in double-stranded DNA. Potential inhibitors of BGT were developed by structure-based design and synthesized. The designed inhibitors 1–6 provide conformational mimicry of the transition state in glucosyltransfer reactions. The key synthetic steps involve a Michaelis–Arbuzov reaction followed by coupling with uridine-5'-morpholidophosphate as activated UMP derivative. The compounds were tested for in vitro inhibitory activity against BGT and the inhibition kinetics were examined. Three of the designed molecules were found to be potential inhibitors of BGT having IC50 values in the micromolar (µM) range. Useful structure–activity relationships were established which provide guidelines for the design of future generations of inhibitors of BGT.Key words: β-glucosyltransferase, transition state, enzyme inhibitors, structure-based design, synthesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicCarbohydrate Chemistry and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207