MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A New Semiparametric Estimation Method for Accelerated Hazard Model

2011· article· en· W2077082447 on OpenAlexaff
Jiajia Zhang, Yingwei Peng, Ou Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueBiometrics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsSemiparametric regressionComputer scienceSemiparametric modelHazardEstimationKernel density estimationApplied mathematicsLimit (mathematics)Function (biology)Kernel (algebra)Kernel smootherMathematical optimizationEstimating equationsMathematicsMaximum likelihoodNonparametric statisticsKernel methodEconometricsStatisticsEstimatorArtificial intelligenceSupport vector machine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The accelerated hazard model has been proposed for more than a decade. However, its application is still very limited, partly due to the complexity of the existing semiparametric estimation method. We propose a new semiparametric estimation method based on a kernel-smoothed approximation to the limit of a profile likelihood function of the model. The method leads to smooth estimating equations and is easy to use. The estimates from the method are proved to be consistent and asymptotically normal. Our numerical study shows that the new method is more efficient than the existing method. The proposed method is employed to reanalyze the data from a brain tumor treatment study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.444
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.020 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiometricsSame topicStatistical Methods and InferenceFrench-language works237,207