MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077100815 · doi:10.1016/j.carpath.2011.01.001

Recommendations for processing cardiovascular surgical pathology specimens: a consensus statement from the Standards and Definitions Committee of the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology and the Association for European Cardiovascular Pathology

2011· article· en· W2077100815 on OpenAlexaff
James R. Stone, Cristina Basso, Ulrik Baandrup, Patrick Bruneval, Jagdish Butany, Patrick J. Gallagher, Marc K. Halushka, Dylan V. Miller, Robert F. Padera, Stanley J. Radio, Mary N. Sheppard, Kim Suvarna, Carmela D. Tan, Gaetano Thiene, Allard C. van der Wal, John P. Veinot

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiovascular Pathology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSurgical pathologyMedicinePathologyAnatomical pathologyMolecular pathologyGross examinationImmunohistochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.159
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.149
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score0.842

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1590.149
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.009
Bibliometrics0.0180.008
Science and technology studies0.0060.008
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0240.007
Research integrity0.0190.023
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations111
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCardiovascular PathologySame topicCardiac Structural Anomalies and RepairFrench-language works237,207